<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Dr. Doug Green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drdouggreen.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drdouggreen.com</link>
	<description>Byte-Sized Professional Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 03:21:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thinking Fast and Slow How Your Brain Thinks by Mark Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.drdouggreen.com/2011/thinking-fast-and-slow-how-your-brain-thinks/comment-page-1/#comment-3731</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 03:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drdouggreen.com/?p=3148#comment-3731</guid>
		<description>Correction: December 18, 2011


A review on Nov. 27 about “Thinking, Fast and Slow” erroneously attributed a distinction to the book’s author, Daniel Kahneman, who won the Nobel in economic science in 2002. His being a psychologist was indeed unusual but did not make his award “unique in the history of the prize.” Another psychologist, Herbert A. Simon, won the award in 1978. (Simon, a polymath and interdisciplinarian, was also an economist, a political scientist and a sociologist.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction: December 18, 2011</p>
<p>A review on Nov. 27 about “Thinking, Fast and Slow” erroneously attributed a distinction to the book’s author, Daniel Kahneman, who won the Nobel in economic science in 2002. His being a psychologist was indeed unusual but did not make his award “unique in the history of the prize.” Another psychologist, Herbert A. Simon, won the award in 1978. (Simon, a polymath and interdisciplinarian, was also an economist, a political scientist and a sociologist.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dr. Doug as Guest Blogger! by Janet &#124; expateducator.com</title>
		<link>http://www.drdouggreen.com/2010/dr-doug-as-guest-blogger/comment-page-1/#comment-3682</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet &#124; expateducator.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drdouggreen.com/?p=509#comment-3682</guid>
		<description>I just came across your blog. Turns out I unknowingly wrote a similar post this past week. 

I&#039;m not sure if the tech position should be completely eliminated - some teachers really need the guidance. However, having a tech position makes it seem like the focus is on the technology rather than the learning.

Anyway, here are my more formal thoughts: http://wp.me/p1Dq2f-lK

I submitted a guest post proposal with Dangerously Irrelevant. Hoping I get it...

Janet &#124; expateducator.com
@jabbacrombie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came across your blog. Turns out I unknowingly wrote a similar post this past week. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if the tech position should be completely eliminated &#8211; some teachers really need the guidance. However, having a tech position makes it seem like the focus is on the technology rather than the learning.</p>
<p>Anyway, here are my more formal thoughts: <a href="http://wp.me/p1Dq2f-lK" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/p1Dq2f-lK</a></p>
<p>I submitted a guest post proposal with Dangerously Irrelevant. Hoping I get it&#8230;</p>
<p>Janet | expateducator.com<br />
@jabbacrombie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Now You See It Must Read Book Summary by Dorie</title>
		<link>http://www.drdouggreen.com/2011/now-you-see-it-must-read-book-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-3404</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drdouggreen.com/?p=2645#comment-3404</guid>
		<description>Your&#039;s is a point of view where real intellcigene shines through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your&#8217;s is a point of view where real intellcigene shines through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Finnish Lessons &#8211; What We Can Learn by Leah</title>
		<link>http://www.drdouggreen.com/2011/finnish-lessons-what-we-can-learn/comment-page-1/#comment-3254</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drdouggreen.com/?p=3631#comment-3254</guid>
		<description>An amazing summary and thank you DgBorn for clearing that up. Actually, I also heard that the NME is also taken at 16.  

The overall picture I get is that things are much more customized in Finland- principals and administrators work with teachers to make them better at what they do best and teachers customize the student experience for each student helping them to achieve more in their strengths. 

I wonder if things are also different from an employer perspective. I feel like employers are one of the key driving factors to get all of our students in the US to college and some employers won&#039;t value a vocational or trade school like they will a top University. I wonder if the culture is different in Finland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An amazing summary and thank you DgBorn for clearing that up. Actually, I also heard that the NME is also taken at 16.  </p>
<p>The overall picture I get is that things are much more customized in Finland- principals and administrators work with teachers to make them better at what they do best and teachers customize the student experience for each student helping them to achieve more in their strengths. </p>
<p>I wonder if things are also different from an employer perspective. I feel like employers are one of the key driving factors to get all of our students in the US to college and some employers won&#8217;t value a vocational or trade school like they will a top University. I wonder if the culture is different in Finland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Finnish Lessons &#8211; What We Can Learn by DgBorn</title>
		<link>http://www.drdouggreen.com/2011/finnish-lessons-what-we-can-learn/comment-page-1/#comment-3188</link>
		<dc:creator>DgBorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drdouggreen.com/?p=3631#comment-3188</guid>
		<description>This is a nice summary.

However, there&#039;s a minor flaw in the description of the current structure of the Finnish education system. There is no standardized test at age 16; the national matriculation exam is the final test of the upper secondary school (called lukio, somewhat equivalent to the American high school, even though more advanced topics such as differential calculus are taught). 

Also, the test can be taken in three parts and students are free to choice which tests they will take, and will they take them in the spring or in the autumn.

Those who choose the vocational education never take any standardized tests, and the choice between upper secondary school and vocational school is not entirely, or not even largely nowadays, determined by academic success: many successful students also opt for vocational education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a nice summary.</p>
<p>However, there&#8217;s a minor flaw in the description of the current structure of the Finnish education system. There is no standardized test at age 16; the national matriculation exam is the final test of the upper secondary school (called lukio, somewhat equivalent to the American high school, even though more advanced topics such as differential calculus are taught). </p>
<p>Also, the test can be taken in three parts and students are free to choice which tests they will take, and will they take them in the spring or in the autumn.</p>
<p>Those who choose the vocational education never take any standardized tests, and the choice between upper secondary school and vocational school is not entirely, or not even largely nowadays, determined by academic success: many successful students also opt for vocational education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

