In an effort to deal with a $1 billion budget shortfall, Gov. Bill Ritner (Democrat) of Colorado is proposing a $260 million cut to education. He is also proposing eliminating tax breaks to producers of bull semen and other agricultural products. In addition, he proposes that State colleges be given the power to increase tuition 9 percent. An additional $132 million of income will come from charging sales tax on candy and soft drinks as well as online sales. Now it is up to the Democrat controlled legislature to write the budget for the next fiscal year, which starts in July. Look to this blog for how other states deal with budget issues as they apply to education as they are announced.
Archive for the ‘News that matters’ Category
Bad News for the Bull Semen Biz
Monday, November 9th, 2009Can exercise make you smarter?
Thursday, September 24th, 2009A recent article in the NY Times by Gretchen Reynolds discusses how aerobic exercise that causes the heart to work hard can promote the growth of new brain cells. The dramatic change in blood flow that occurs when you run, cycle, or swim can promote new connections and help create new neurons.
Click here to go to the article in the New York Times from 9/16/2009.
DARPA Network Challenge – Very Cool!
Wednesday, April 14th, 2010The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency invented the Internet. Their recent Network Challenge tested how social networks can solve problems. DARPA placed ten 8-foot balloons around the United States. It was up to self-generated teams to find them. Facebook helped expand teams and Twitter proved to be a fast and dynamic data source. Noise in Tweet data streams, however, made it difficult to extract information. It showed that distrust of one’s purpose makes individuals less likely to join and recruit their friends. Watch for more cool experiments and beware of bad guys using this type of crowd-sourcing. The 17-page project report is readable and interesting.
Click here for the report.
Good men are hard to find.
Monday, February 15th, 2010Women have been outperforming men in school for some time. Now the numbers are in and their better performance in schools is paying off in the work place. In terms of pay and employment, women have made big gains at the expense of men. According to an article by M. P. McQueen in the February 12, 2010 “Wall Street Journal”, by 2007, women were earning 35% more bachelor’s degrees and 66% more associate’s degrees than men. While women still make less than men, they are catching up as their pay increased 5.3% last year compared to 3.4% for men. These numbers are even more unbalanced for blacks where women earn 92% more bachelor’s degrees and have a 13.3% unemployment rate compared to 17.6% for black men.
Steady increases among women with college degrees over the past two decades seems to be paying off in the current economy as women for the first time surpassed the number of men holding payroll jobs. “Men have traditionally needed less education, because guys could get good jobs in construction without a master’s in Education and women couldn’t, so education substitutes for that,” said Claudia Goldin, a Harvard University economist.
Women started catching up by the 1960s, and by the 1980s they were earning more bachelor’s degrees than men, and a growing share of graduate and professional degrees. Woman earn more college degrees in all fields except the physical sciences, math, engineering, business and economics. I think the message here is that males can either work harder in school or work harder to find a good woman who can bring home the bacon.
Click here for the McQueen article.
Great Video by Yong Zhao
Tuesday, August 31st, 2010Youg is the author of a recent book, Catching-Up or Leading the Way, that takes NCLB to task for its emphasis on standardized testing that has been a problem for China for the last 1,400 years. Thanks to the people at The NewLearning Institute, you can now watch a ten minute video in which Yong explains the essence of his vision regarding education and standardized tests. If you want to get a group of educators or parents talking, just show this at a meeting. You should also consider purchasing Yong’s book.
Click here for Yong Zhao’s 10 minute video.
Click here for my summary of Yong’s Book.
Is Obama Bush III on Education?
Tuesday, September 29th, 2009Nick Anderson of the Washington Post reports on September 25, 2009 that Teacher Unions are not happy with what they are seeing from the Obama administration as they approach the reauthorization of NCLB.
“It looks like the only strategies they have are charter schools and measurement,” said Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers. “That’s Bush III.”
Standardized testing, school accountability, performance pay, charter schools — all are integral to President Obama’s $4.35 billion “Race to the Top” grant competition to spur innovation. None is a typical Democratic crowd-pleaser.
Click here to download the entire article.
It would be funny if it weren’t true.
Sunday, December 27th, 2009An article in the NY TImes (12/27/2009) sites a department of Education estimate that in order to apply for part of the $4 billion in federal Race to the Top grant money, a state will need to spend 681 hours to fill out the application. If you haven’t seen the application it is available below. I can’t imagine anyone reading it all without being compensated, but a quick scan is likely to be amusing or depressing depending on your personality.
Click here to see the article..
Click here to see the Race to the top application..
March Madness – UPDATED 4/1/2010!
Friday, March 19th, 2010Updated 4/1/2010 after announcement of round one winners (Start with slide 15 for update.) I couldn’t help but notice how the current madness associated with the Race to the Top finalists and the Obama Administration’s blueprint for reauthorization of NCLB are analogous to the other madness associated with March. Don’t forget that the secretary of education was a basketball player. Thanks to information from the New York Times, Education Week, and my own thinking, I have a humorous (I hope) and factual take on the current status. Let me know what you think (dgreen@stny.rr.com).
Click here to see Dr. Doug’s March Madness..
Nobody interviews for a living.
Thursday, October 15th, 2009Interviews are less predictive of job performance than work samples, job-knowledge tests, and peer ratings of past job performance. Even a simple intelligence test is dramatically more useful. This is according to Dan and Chip Heath, authors of Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die. The article can be found in the January issue of Fast Company. (www.fastcompany.com) They cite studies that show that the only thing interviews correlate with is the ability to interview. People who think they are good at judging people in interviews need to think again. A college transcript is based on four years of the cumulative evaluation of 20 to 40 professors. If you think you can do better after an interview, I admire your self-esteem but not your judgment. So what does an administrator do? Simple, watch someone teach. Better yet, get input from people you trust who have seen the person in action. They are more likely to see the real thing as anyone can turn it on when the boss walks through. Listen carefully for indications of teaching talent rather than superficial judgments like those you would gather during an interview.





